Tigers lost, 20-17. I could write a lot about this game, but the sportswriters have covered everything of significance better than I could. The problems and consequences were obvious. So I’ll write about something else. But before I do, I want to talk about one area that I think the sportswriters gave short shrift. They accepted that Maryland’s adjustment on defense at the half “left Spence no choice” but to go away from the running game. I don’t agree. I believe Spence looked at the alignment change of the front seven, the position of the safeties, and went away from the running game before ever fully testing whether the change would take away the run. James was fired up all day; I don’t think I’ve ever seen him look quicker. But after the first series in the second half, we quit giving him and C.J. the ball, despite the fact that on that first drive the running plays were 2 yards, 5 yards, 5 yards, 7 yards, and 2 yards. That is an average rushing gain of over 4 yards per rush. I’ll take that any day. Granted, silly penalties negated some of those rushes and put us in a passing situation, but after that drive, we went away from the running game. Who knows what would have happened had we kept pounding. But we’ll never know. We’ll only know that once again we hear our coaches talk about how adjustments by the other team affected our play calling. Strange how our adjustments in response to the other team’s never seem to have their coaches talking about us after the game!
Now the Tigers made too many mistakes to win this game. But their enthusiasm in the first half overcame mistakes, perhaps more serious mistakes than those in the second. Mistakes gave the ball to the Terps on our own 18 and 30 in the first half. No mistakes quite that serious happened in the second. Hard, enthusiastic play overcame those mistakes in the first half. What happened to that enthusiasm? Does this team have so little character, so little leadership—both from players and coaches—that one play, a long reverse, eliminated all that enthusiasm? After all, they still had a four point lead after the TD that followed that reverse. But the coaches and the team fell apart. Suddenly, we could not generate any offense and the defense slowly began to let Maryland make plays. After that it was just a matter of time.
OK, I said I was going to write about something else. That, of course, is the future. On the drive home, I, like many other fans, fumed and wondered about why this seems to keep happening. This being that the Tigers seem to start strong, whether we’re talking about a season or a game, and then fizzle. Now I know there are exceptions, like the 5-game finish several years ago that may have saved Tommy’s job. But there’s a pattern here of not living up to expectations, of not winning when you’re favored and clearly the more talented team (no disrespect to Maryland; after all, they won). So I was wondering what the stats are on that. And Larry Williams, who does a wonderful job of saying what Tiger fans are thinking, produced this line: “When ranked at home under Tommy Bowden, the Tigers have lost to unranked teams seven times.” Whoa, read that again. Think about that. Now, if I had the time, I’d love to see what percentage of games has Bowden’s Tigers lost when they were favored and ranked as well as favored and unranked. But seven losses at home to unranked teams when we were ranked. My gosh! We average 7 home games a year. We’ve played 4 this year. So out of total of 67 games, we’ve lost 7 when we were favored and ranked. And we’ve lost them to unranked teams!!!!! That’s over 10% of ALL home games. I knew there was a pattern that we didn’t win the games we were supposed to, but I never guessed it was that bad. Too many bowl games, too many overall wins to obscure that fact, I guess. That indicates a total lack of the coaching staff’s ability to motivate and inspire the team. We win some big games because the players motivate themselves. But the pattern indicates a basic problem with our coaching staff. I think it’s time for a change. Let’s accept the financial hit and the possibility that the program will stall for a year or two and make a change. As far as the financial hit, who knows, the Federal government may bail us out. As far as the other, I don’t know that it can get any worse. Time for a change.
And I suspect, if Bowden doesn’t win the ACC, Terry Don will think the same thing.